Headlines


Click on Headline for Full Story



 

THE STEADY, strong winds over the Atlantic off New England have attracted another developer interested in harnessing them for power generation. A new wrinkle in the proposal by Grays Harbor Ocean Energy Company, of Washington state, is that the supports anchoring each wind turbine platform to the ocean floor would be designed in a way to turn wave action into electricity as well.

For Grays Harbor, this feature serves two purposes: It increases the likelihood that its platforms will be producing power even when winds are still, and it qualifies the initial stages of the project for review by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission instead of the Minerals Management Service of the Department of the Interior.

Why one federal agency should have supervision over ocean wave energy and another over ocean wind energy is one of those governmental head-scratchers that turn organization charts into mazes. Congress should resolve the disparity as soon as possible. It should also facilitate all offshore energy projects by granting the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration increased funds for seabed surveys.



Parents who smoke often open a window or turn on a fan to clear the air of second-hand smoke, but experts now have identified another smoking-related threat to children’s health that isn’t as easy to get rid of: third-hand smoke.

That’s the term being used to describe the invisible yet toxic brew of gases and particles clinging to smokers’ hair and clothing, not to mention cushions and carpeting, that lingers long after smoke has cleared from a room. The residue includes heavy metals, carcinogens and even radioactive materials that young children can get on their hands and ingest, especially if they’re crawling or playing on the floor.

Doctors from MassGeneral Hospital for Children in Boston coined the term “third-hand smoke” to describe these chemicals in a new study that focused on the risks they pose to infants and children. The study was published in this month’s issue of the journal Pediatrics.

“Everyone knows that second-hand smoke is bad, but they don’t know about this,” said Dr. Jonathan P. Winickoff, the lead author of the study and an assistant professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School.



In a single year, a coal-fired electric plant deposited more than 2.2 million pounds of toxic materials in a holding pond that failed last week, flooding 300 acres in East Tennessee, according to a 2007 inventory filed with the Environmental Protection Agency.

The inventory, disclosed by the Tennessee Valley Authority on Monday at the request of The New York Times, showed that in just one year, the plant’s byproducts included 45,000 pounds of arsenic, 49,000 pounds of lead, 1.4 million pounds of barium, 91,000 pounds of chromium and 140,000 pounds of manganese. Those metals can cause cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, among other health problems.

And the holding pond, at the Kingston Fossil Plant, a T.V.A. plant 40 miles west of Knoxville, contained many decades’ worth of these deposits.

For days, authority officials have maintained that the sludge released in the spill is not toxic, though coal ash has long been known to contain dangerous concentrations of heavy metals. On Monday, a week after the spill, the authority issued a joint statement with the E.P.A. and other agencies recommending that direct contact with the ash be avoided and that pets and children should be kept away from affected areas.

Residents complained that the authority had been slow to issue information about the contents of the ash and the water, soil and sediment samples taken in and around the spill.

“They think that the public is stupid, that they can’t put two and two together,” said Sandy Gupton, a registered nurse who hired an independent firm to test the spring water on her family’s 300-acre farm, now sullied by sludge from the spill. “It took five days for the T.V.A. to respond to us.”

 

Not all compact fluorescent light bulbs are created equal

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Compact fluorescent light bulbs are not all created equal, and federal regulators should start telling consumers the difference, according to a new report from the Washington-based Environmental Working Group.

Some types and brands of the bulbs - known as CFLs - last far longer than others and also contain much lower levels of toxic mercury, according to the group's report, "Lighten Up in '09."

According to the Environmental Working Group, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has granted its Energy Star seal of approval to "a vast array of CFL bulbs, including a number of inferior models with unnecessarily high mercury levels and mediocre lifespans."

"Energy Star labels can be found on the most efficient, safest bulbs available, as well as on some of the worst, misleading the consumer and giving manufacturers zero incentive to make a greener bulb," said EWG senior analyst Sean Gray.

"The Obama administration needs to reinvigorate the Energy Star program to drive innovation in safety and efficiency of home and business lighting," Gray said.



The TV spot opens with a man saying he’s in a “state of the art” facility. He dons a hard hat, opens a door and shows the audience a barren landscape of sand and rocks.

“This is today’s clean-coal technology,” he says with feigned enthusiasm. Seconds later, the words “In reality, there is no such thing as clean coal” scroll across the screen.

That statement, said Phil Gonet, president of the Illinois Coal Association, is “a bald-faced lie.”

“There is considerable progress being made. Twenty or 30 years ago, people didn’t think sulfur could be removed from coal. Today, we have scrubbers,” Gonet said, referring to technology widely used to remove sulfur dioxide from coal.

The advertisement was created by the Reality Coalition, a grassroots effort launched this month by the Alliance for Climate Protection, League of Conservation Voters, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council and Sierra Club.
The groups argue that while the coal industry has spent millions of dollars promoting the idea of “clean” coal, it is far behind in actually launching technology to rid emissions of carbon dioxide, a major pollutant seen as the primary cause of global warming.

A press release from the Natural Resources Defense Council says the Reality campaign is “telling the simple truth: In reality, there is no such thing as clean coal.”